Aistė Oželytė, Lina Gedrimė, Rita Urbanavičė
Abstract
Patient autonomy is crucial for delivering high-quality care. It empowers individuals in their treatment, enhancing dignity, improving health outcomes, and increasing satisfaction. However, barriers hinder its promotion, leading to inadequate patient information and nurses’ decisions that compromise autonomy. This study explores how information and nursing decisions influence patient autonomy.
Materials and methods. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University (Nr. 150000-S-831), and the healthcare institution’s administration. Data collection took place from December 2024 to January 2025 in Hospital X’s therapeutic, nursing, and palliative care departments, involving 15 participants. Data analysis was conducted using the inductive content analysis method.
Results. Nurses promote patient autonomy in medical settings and after discharge. Methods include delegating tasks, encouraging decision-making, and providing personalized information. After discharge, autonomy is maintained by teaching patients to monitor their health, perform long-term procedures, and self-advocate. Nurses understand that information fosters independent decision-making, using it as a strategy during hospitalization and an educational resource to enhance post-discharge autonomy. However, patient information is divided into mandatory and non-mandatory categories. Those with cognitive impairments or severe disabilities do not receive non-mandatory information and methods aimed at promoting autonomy.
Conclusion. Nurses strive to promote patients’ autonomy both during hospitalization and after discharge. Providing information is considered essential for fostering patients’ autonomy in both situations. However, all these methods were not used when addressing patients who are cognitively impaired or have severe physical disabilities.
Keyword(s): Patient autonomy, nurses, decision-making, information, patients.
DOI: 10.35988/sm-hs.2025.117
Full Text: PDF